Adrian Whiting
Joined: 31 Aug 2005 |
Posts: 76 |
Location: Dorset, England |
|
![](./templates/Morpheus/images/spacer.gif) |
Posted: Tue Jul 02, 2013 10:22 am |
|
![](./templates/Morpheus/images/posttop_left.gif) |
![Reply with quote Reply with quote](templates/Morpheus/images/lang_english/blue/icon_quote.gif) |
![](./templates/Morpheus/images/spacer.gif) |
![](./templates/Morpheus/images/spacer.gif) |
Hello Kiwi Sapper,
Hopefully someone will be able to provide the exact details, but to try and offer a starting point;
The 1/24 received their MHRs circa 1875, the 2/24 by March 1875 (possibly late 1874). I believe both battalions had been issued the Snider Enfield, which was then replaced by the MHR. The Snider would have been issued from circa 1866. Philip Gon in "The road to Isandlwana (sic)" makes reference to the mounted infantry retaining the Snider post the MHR being available due to handing and felt recoil considerations.
The Snider would have been preceded by the Pattern '53 Enfield rifle, though I cannot assist with definitive details for either battalion. P53s were issued from circa 1854/5 (there had been issues prior to this in more limited numbers) but the supply was by the trade problematic and in fact led to a developing preference for RSAF manufacture for service arms.
The P53 was preceded by either the Pattern 51 Minie Rifle or the Pattern 1839 or 1842 Rifle Musket. I do not know which the 24th battalions had, if indeed they had any. The P39 and P42 were originally simple percussion muskets (smooth bore). The P51 was accepted for service and accordingly a number of the earlier muskets were simply rifled on the Minie principle. This led to a significant bore diameter, in the P42 Rifle Musket's case it was .758". It is possible that some battalions went from percussion musket to P53 Enfield.
As I say, hopefully someone will have exact details and dates for the 24th for you.
|
_________________ Hope this assists,
Adrian
|