rorkesdriftvc.com Forum Index


rorkesdriftvc.com
Discussions related to the Anglo-Zulu War of 1879
Reply to topic
AMB


Joined: 07 Oct 2005
Posts: 871
Location: Queensland, Australia
Reply with quote
A thought: did the colonials (some of whom may have been familiar with the river's normal state) and the imperial troops all state that the river was flood?

As Paul has suggested earlier; some not knowing local conditions may have suggested a state of flood when the situation was 'normal'.

Only a thought!

AMB
View user's profileSend private message
Alan
Site Admin

Joined: 30 Aug 2005
Posts: 1326
Location: Wales
Reply with quote
That's true enough but if you saw something for the first time, would you say it was in flood
or just a fast-flowing deep river. In any event, we know that if it was as he described it,
it was in flood, as many of us have seen it in normal none-flood conditions.

I haven't read any of the Colonials' versions, so don't know about that.

Just a thought.

_________________
View user's profileSend private messageSend e-mailVisit poster's website
River crossing 22 jan 1879
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
All times are GMT  
Page 2 of 2  

  
  
 Reply to topic