Supplementary Paper/Booklet Details ? |
Denton Van Zan
Guest
|
Peter Q
Any further details about your booklet ? Thankyou C.J. |
||||||||||||
|
Denton Van Zan
Guest
|
Peter Q
Thankyou very much for answering my enquiry. The contents sound hugely interesting and guarantee several debates. Looking forward to it immensely. Thanks again. C.J. |
||||||||||||
|
Alan
Site Admin
|
The article is indeed fascinating and will been shortly placed on the site. It won't be in the Pot Pourri section, rather it will be included in the 'Isandhlwana' section. It does promise to encourage some considerable debate. I'll post details as soon as it is available.
|
||||||||||||
|
Denton Van Zan
Guest
|
Peter Q
I've now read your paper with great interest, which I'll re-read again tomorrow. I'll leave it to others to start any topics on your findings. C.J. |
||||||||||||
|
Peter Quantrill
Guest
|
Coll,
Suggest that should you have comments, it would perhaps be done by you opening a new topic, (rather than continue under the present heading,) titled: "Isandlwana: The Missing Five Hours." Or indeed anyone wishing to comment. Peter |
||||||||||||
|
Alan
Site Admin
|
The article is now in the 'Isandhlwana' section.
Go to:- http://www.rorkesdriftvc.com/Isandhlwana/Isandlwana-the-missing-five-hours.htm |
||||||||||||
|
Denton Van Zan
Guest
|
Peter Q
Finally managed to acquire inks, so will print out the paper today for studying in-depth. Also, obtained the necessary bottle of whisky. I consider both the above as a set. I'll not post in the topic on the main forum, which is now on a more balanced level, than how it first started. Looking forward to reading all discussions related to your thesis. Your Good Health. C.J. |
||||||||||||
|
Denton Van Zan
Guest
|
There is so much that appears to be getting overlooked in other topics, whether through ignorance or deliberately, including contradictions from previous topics, as far back as the old forum.
Everything, from dealing with Durnford's mindset, which is a non-argument - to his 'going cowboy' - to the tents, and the reasoning behind the firing line being so far out, which is a ridiculous defence of events regarding Pulleine's actions/deployments. Is it honestly thought that the Zulu army was going to 'stay put' and be 'surprised' by mounted men in a valley ? Zulu scouting was the best there was, so how could they be 'found' without any of them noticing events at the Isandlwana camp ? It appears the 'decoy' aspect is being focussed on in the main forum, from a paper that is 27 pages in length - does the rest of it count for nothing ? As for it being 'cluttered' or such, it was actually directed at enthusiasts, who may not be so 'wised-up' on everything else that was happening, who needed, including myself, more details. Thank god I'm not posting on the main forum, as I'm furious. I'm not looking for any replies to this post. C.J. |
||||||||||||
|
Supplementary Paper/Booklet Details ? |
|
||
Powered by phpBB © 2001-2004 phpBB Group
phpBB Style created by phpBBStyles.com and distributed by Styles Database.
phpBB Style created by phpBBStyles.com and distributed by Styles Database.